Yesterday, INFORMS announced its voting pool for Official Definition of Analytics. The definition is as follows:
Although this definition of Analytics is similar to my understanding of Analytics, it makes me feel that Analytics is something for people mainly working with huge data like statisticians and computer scientists (capable of performing regression and time series analysis, multi-variate statistics, data mining, and information retrieval), and not someone who's working mainly with optimization models.
I'd would really appreciate it if you share your thoughts on this. In particular:
asked 09 Jun '12, 15:07
Your questions remind me of my post Is Optimization Part Of Analytics?
The proposed definition would lead to a yes answer if one focuses on the "making better decision" part. But the real question to me is: do we need to get insight from data analysis before making better decisions?
Sometimes the answer is yes. For instance one needs sales forecast in order to plan production. Such forecast comes from insight derived from data about past sales.
But there are also cases where optimization does not require insight derived from data analysis. For instance in fleet assignment, you are given a flight schedule, and you need to assign a physical plane to each scheduled flight. There is no insight derived from data here.
Back to your questions, answer to 1 is to prepare for the cases where optimization uses data analysis insight as input, as explained above.
Answer to 2 is that OR professional often have mathematical background useful to learn data analysis techniques.
answered 09 Jun '12, 17:53
A few years ago SAS were concerned that the term Business Intelligence (BI) was getting all the attention. BI is basically just reporting (descriptive statistics), and is done reasonably well be lots of software platforms. To distinguish their strengths they started using the term Business Analytics at every opportunity, and introduced the following graph, which I really like.
Basically, it separates Business Analytics into several categories. These are real distinctions, and SAS sells different software for each, but are somewhat artificial from a practitioners point of view since multiple types are often needed to deliver a desired result.
The idea is that as an organization's analytical capability matures they are able to move past BI, which describes the past, to more advanced analytics that help decide what to do in the future.
This doesn't answer your questions specifically, but I think it's relevant to the discussion.
Note that SAS keeps pushing the term Business Analytics, since in recent years the term "analytics" has been co-opted by the web-development community to mean website statistics.
answered 09 Jun '12, 19:57
DC Woods ♦
IBM has been pushing a three-tiered model (think pyramid) for analytics that seems to resonate with many people. I'm paraphrasing from (suspect) memory, so apologies to IBM if I screw this up. The bottom tier is "descriptive analytics" (what the heck is going on here?). The middle tier is "predictive analytics" (what is going to happen if I do X? what is going to happen in the absence of any action/intervention?) The top tier, "prescriptive analytics", is where we optimizers live (now that I've got my descriptions and predictions, what the heck should I do?). In the context of the proposed INFORMS definition, optimization would be lurking in the phrase "better decisions".
Regarding your first question, I'm not sure we all need to stampede toward analytics, or at least not toward data molesting. (I'm too old to change.) That said, there is a growing demand for data analysis (especially large and/or real-time data sources). To some extent, the data side is the new frontier. Meanwhile, optimization is perhaps a bit more mature (with apologies to statisticians who've been running regressions since Gauss got out of diapers), and is finding its way more and more into canned software; so the need for more optimization experts may not be as great.
For the second question, I would hazard a guess that, besides technical chops, what my org behavior colleagues refer to as "openness to experience" might be important. If you're the sort that views everything through the same prism, or always wants to use the same tools, you may not be apt at finding information in sheep entrails. I tend to think that data dredging requires both an active imagination and a willingness to try this, try that, ...
answered 09 Jun '12, 18:05
Paul Rubin ♦
from the standpoint of a professional organization, it makes perfect sense to give "operations research" and "management science" a meaning that is better accessible to the general public and to a larger number of well-trained persons. Hopefully, more people will understand what OR is about and why we need more not less.
as an operations researcher it makes me sad, of course, that this "new name" somewhat implies that operations research ever was anything less than giving perfect meaning to a wealth of data. Of course, since the very beginning this implied to help make better decisions.
as an applied mathematician (and @Paul, I am not yet "apostate", even though at a business school now!), I am afraid, of course, that "hard core" OR will disappear from INFORMS' radar. many OR/Analytics/MS/whatever problems are very, very difficult and complex, and addressing a lot more people (and nothing else happens by the name change) necessarily implies going "softer". A bad trend in my view.
answered 09 Jun '12, 19:43
Marco Luebbecke ♦
First of all, thanks for bringing about this wonderful discussion on a great overarching field called Analytics. I tend to agree with the 3-tier pyramid definition (purportedly given by IBM-any reference?), where all of Statistics, OR and Computer Science (read Machine Intelligence/learning, Soft Computing/Computational Intelligence) would fit in quite comfortably. Having been qualified in all the three fields, I tend to advice the Analytics fraternity not to be jingoistic/nationalistic about their own field (Stats or OR or CS),as each of the three disciplines is subsumed by the word analytics and modern research frequently suggests the use of them in combination rather than in isolation in order to solve the problems better.
Unfortunately, the word analytics has become most 'abused' word nowadays, as every Tom, Dick and Harry talks about without actually knowing its true meaning.
My two cents, Dr Ravi Vadlamani
Re: Michael Trick's post, Vindictive Analytics is the vindictive cousin of Forensic Analytics.
answered 27 Jan '14, 15:29
Mark L Stone
Re: jfpuget's link to http://www.analytics-magazine.org/november-december-2010/54-the-analytics-journey , which says
Depending on what is meant by "high-volume" and "transactional" applications, nonlinear, even non-convex, optimization can and is used to solve large numbers of problems in real-time (not to mention oodles of LPs). Perhaps it comes down to what the value of solving those real-time optimization problems is.
I could tell you the details, but then I'd have to kill you.